Analysis of Cognitive Aspects of Test Techniques in Islamic education Learning

Authors

  • Winda Sulistyarini Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Maemonah Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54956/edukasi.v10i2.278

Keywords:

Assessment, Cognitive, Test Techniques, PAI

Abstract

Assessment activities in schools are part of the learning process to reflect an understanding of individual students and measure progress. In assessment, the domain is the cognitive aspect and is part of the assessment of intellectual abilities related to the student's knowledge. This study aimed to identify and analyze assessments of cognitive aspects of testing techniques in PAI learning at SMP Negeri 2 Nusawungu. This research uses field research, interview techniques, and documentation. The findings of this study suggest that PAI teachers' assessments of cognitive aspects of testing techniques tend to use objective testing techniques, such as short-answer and oral, and subjective forms of descriptive testing techniques. The cognitive level of the test technique is C1-C2, and the dimensions are factual knowledge and conceptual knowledge. This testing technique has advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that there is an increase in the learning outcomes of class VIII students, which are known to be better than the previous semester. Meanwhile, the drawback is that the test technique has not yet reached the HOTS level and uses only a few types of instrument techniques.

References

Arikunto, S. (2004). The Basics of Educational Evaluation. Earth Literature.

Bloom, B. (1956). The Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives: The Classification Of Educational Goals, Handbook One: The Cognitive Domain. Mc. Kay.

Gunawan, I., & Paluti, A. R. (2017). Bloom's Taxonomy – Revision of the Cognitive Realm. E-Journal. Unipma, 7(1), 1–8. Http://E-Journal.Unipma.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Pe

Hasim, H., Hasniah, H., & Arsyam, M. (2021). Techniques and Forms of Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Ddi. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.31219/Osf.Io/M4yk5

Ikhwan, A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Dasar (Mengenal Model Penelitian dan Sistematikanya). Tulungagung: STAI Muhammadiyah Tulungagung

Irvine, J. (2017). A Comparison Of Revised Bloom And Marzano's New Taxonomy Of Learning. Research In Higher Education Journal, 33, 1–16.

Kadir, A. (2015). Compile and Analyze Abdul Kadir's Learning Outcomes Test. Al-Ta'dib, 8(2), 70–81.

Maemonah. (2018). Learning Assessment. Pgmi Press Uin Likes.

Magdalena, I., Fajriyati Islami, N., Rasid, E. A., & Diasty, N. T. (2020). Three Areas of Bloom's Taxonomy in Education. Journal of Education And Science, 2(1), 132–139.

Mansir, F., & Purnomo, H. (2020). Islamic Education Learning Strategies Based On Multiple Intelligences In Islamic School. Psychic: Journal of Islamic Psychology, 6(1), 48–57. Https://Doi.Org/10.19109/Psikis.V6i1.4011

Marlena, N. (2018). The Relationship between Cognitive Aspect Learning Outcomes in the Field of Islamic Religious Education Studies with the Morals of 26 Kaur Elementary School Students, Kaur Regency. Bengkulu State Islamic Institute of Religion (Iain).

Musial, D. (2009). Foundation Of Meaningful Educational Assessment. McGraw-Hill.

Purnama, T. S. (2019). Islamic Education Model For Preparing Generations In The Industrial Revolution 4 . 0 At Al Azhar University Indonesia ( Uai ). October.

Rosyidi, D. (2020). Cognitive domain assessment techniques and instruments. Tasyri', 27(1), 1–13. Http://Ejournal.Kopertais4.Or.Id/Pantura/Index.Php/Tasyri/Article/View/3479/2482

Sangaji, E. M., & Sopiah, Sopiah. (2010). Research Methodology: Practical Approaches in Research. Andi.

Saraswathy, N. A. (2021). The Revised Taxonomy Structure Based On Cognitive. 20(5), 5616–5620. Https://Doi.Org/10.17051/Ilkonline.2021.05.633

Sawaluddin, S., & Muhammad, S. (2020). Steps and Techniques for Evaluation of Islamic Religious Education Learning Outcomes. Journal of Ptk and Education, 6(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.18592/Ptk.V6i1.3793

Sukiman. (2012). Evaluation System Development. Madani Human.

Tamrin, T., & Munawaroh, F. (2019). Techniques and Instruments for Assessing Students' Cognitive Areas in Learning Pie. Al-Liqo: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 121–139. Https://Doi.Org/10.46963/Alliqo.V4i1.20

Uma, D., Thenmozhi, S., & Hansda, R. (2018). Analysis On Cognitive Thinking Of An Assessment System Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Proceedings - 5th Ieee International Conference On Moocs, Innovation, And Technology In Education, Mite 2017, 152–159. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Mite.2017.00033

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2012). Evaluation of Learning Programs: A Practical Guide for Educators and Prospective Educators. Student Library.

Yusuf, A. M. (2015). Educational Assessment and Evaluation: Pillar of Information Providers and Education Quality Control Activities. Kencana.

Downloads

Published

20-08-2022

How to Cite

Sulistyarini, W., & Maemonah. (2022). Analysis of Cognitive Aspects of Test Techniques in Islamic education Learning. EDUKASI : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam (e-Journal), 10(2), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.54956/edukasi.v10i2.278